On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:17, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 02:35:39AM -0800, rupert.thurner wrote: > > On Oct 21, 9:51 am, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:19:08PM -0700, rupert.thurner wrote: > > > > on solaris, one test is failing for 1.7.0 ... > > > > At least one test FAILED, checking /home/rupert/mgar-sav/pkg/ > > > > subversion/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/ > > > > subversion-1.7.0/tests.log > > > > FAIL: copy_tests.py 86:changeddiraftercommitshouldmatch > > > >checkout > > > > Summary of test results: > > > > 1552 tests PASSED > > > > 42 tests SKIPPED > > > > 23 tests XFAILED (1 WORK-IN-PROGRESS) > > > > 1 test FAILED > > > > gmake: *** [check] Error 1 > > > > > > Please show the output of: > > > > > > $ cd > /home/rupert/mgar-sav/pkg/subversion/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sp > arcv8/subversion-1.7.0/subversion/tests/cmdline > > > $ ./copy_tests.py 86 --verbose > > > > > > rupert @ unstable9s : ~/mgar-sav/pkg/subversion/trunk/work/solaris9- > > sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/subversion-1.7.2/subversion/tests/cmdline > > $ ./copy_tests.py 86 --verbose > > > PASS: copy_tests.py 86: changed dir after commit should match > > checkout > > So this time, it passed. This is probably just a race condition in the > test where it might not succeed if timestamps on disk aren't updated > quickly enough. Can you get it to fail again by running it a couple > of times? > > I think you can safely ignore this failure. > every time i run it with the test suite it fails. from java i know that the timestamps on solaris are 4 digits less accurate than on windows. can this be an issue here as well? rupert.
