Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes:

> State 3: after A/B to A/B2 then A to A2
> op_depth  local_relpath  presence  moved_here  moved_to
>       0    A              normal                A2
>       0    A/B            normal                A2/B

Typo, moved_to should be A2/B2.

>       1    A              base-deleted
>       1    A/B            base-deleted
>       1    A2             normal    1
>       1    A2/B           normal
>       2    A2/B           base-deleted
>       2    A2/B2          normal    1
>
> Which of these is correct, A2/B moved_here or not?

In r1213651 I've made A2/B get marked moved_here. So now the states are:

State 1: after A to A2
op_depth  local_relpath  presence  moved_here  moved_to
      0    A              normal                A2
      0    A/B            normal
      1    A              base-deleted
      1    A/B            base-deleted
      1    A2             normal    1
      1    A2/B           normal    1

State 1x: after A/B to A/B2
op_depth  local_relpath  presence  moved_here  moved_to
      0    A              normal
      0    A/B            normal                A/B2
      2    A/B            base-deleted
      2    A/B2           normal    1


State 2: after A to A2 then A2/B to A2/B2
State 3: after A/B to A/B2 then A to A2
op_depth  local_relpath  presence  moved_here  moved_to
      0    A              normal                A2
      0    A/B            normal                A2/B2
      1    A              base-deleted
      1    A/B            base-deleted
      1    A2             normal    1
      1    A2/B           normal    1
      2    A2/B           base-deleted
      2    A2/B2          normal    1


-- 
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com

Reply via email to