julianf...@apache.org writes: > Author: julianfoad > Date: Mon Nov 21 13:38:13 2011 > New Revision: 1204489 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1204489&view=rev > Log: > Move more variables to a smaller scope and fix uninitialized output > parameters in callback functions. The variables previously had > initializers which were only necessary because the callbacks didn't > always initialize all their outputs as they should. This change might be > expected to cause a behaviour change, since the initialization was > previously happening only once before the first iteration of the loop. > I have checked fairly thoroughly and it seems in the cases where > outputs weren't initialized they weren't tested or the loop terminated > or there was some other compensating effect.
> @@ -6726,9 +6735,6 @@ do_file_merge(svn_mergeinfo_catalog_t re > apr_pool_t *scratch_pool) > { > apr_array_header_t *remaining_ranges; > - svn_wc_notify_state_t prop_state = svn_wc_notify_state_unknown; > - svn_wc_notify_state_t text_state = svn_wc_notify_state_unknown; > - svn_boolean_t tree_conflicted = FALSE; > svn_client_ctx_t *ctx = merge_b->ctx; > const char *mergeinfo_path; > svn_merge_range_t range; > @@ -6855,6 +6861,8 @@ do_file_merge(svn_mergeinfo_catalog_t re > svn_string_t *pval; > const char *mimetype1, *mimetype2; > apr_array_header_t *propchanges; > + svn_wc_notify_state_t prop_state, text_state; > + svn_boolean_t tree_conflicted = TRUE; > > svn_pool_clear(iterpool); valgrind is giving me an unitialised memory read error in notify() for the property state during update_tests.py 36. do_file_merge calls merge_file_changed which calls merge_props_changed and inside merge_props_changed props->nelts is zero so the state is not set. Do we solve this by initialising prop_state? To what value? Or do we make merge_props_changed set it when props->nels is zero? To what value? -- Philip