On 11/18/2011 10:26 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > If we add a status->foo flag (like we added the status->changelist bit > in 1.4), we would have to explicitly add it to this if() too --- which is > too easy to forget.
Do you have a concrete suggestion for making this future-proof? If not, we'll simply have to trust that anyone brave enough to add such a new flag is also either smart enough to review all consumers of the structure or mature enough to deal with it when someone eventually blames him or her for not doing so. :-) -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
