On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:40 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:36:13AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > So I would expect sharding within the successors tree > > to behave like this: > > > > filename: file stores successor data created in: > > db/successors/ids/0/0 r0..r999 > > db/successors/ids/0/1 r1000..r1999 > > ... ... > > db/successors/ids/0/999 r1000000..r1999999 > > db/successors/ids/1/0 r2000000..r2000999 > > ... ...
Oops - something's wrong with that pattern. Did you mean .../ids/(rev % 1000000)/(rev % 1000) which would give db/successors/ids/0/0 r0..r999 db/successors/ids/0/1 r1000..r1999 ... ... db/successors/ids/0/999 r999000..r999999 db/successors/ids/1/0 r1000000..r1000999 ... ... ? - Julian > (Of course, this example assumes max-files-per-dir == 1000, > which is the default. > With a different value the one-thousand-revisions-files > would distribute across directories in a different way.)
