On 7 September 2011 14:31, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:23 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 7 September 2011 14:13, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: >>> I think a HEADER.html that links to our download page (that already >>> has all that information) would be fine? >> >> That's not nearly as convenient as having the information on the same >> page (though a link to the download page would be useful). >> Also the headers/footers are mirrored worldwide; download page has >> only 2 mirrors. > > I guess I may not fully understand the problem you are trying to > solve. As a project, we universally direct people to > subversion.apache.org/download/ as the place to get our source > packages. Rarely do we expect people to go directly to w.a.o/dist/, > and if they do, we should expect that they at least have some idea > what they are doing. > > Having some kind of documentation to inform the wayward souls who > stray to w.a.o/dist/ rather than s.a.o/download/ would be nice, but it > shouldn't duplicate the content of s.a.o/download/. I think we'd all > rather maintain one set of docs and just redirect people there (with > the added bonus that it get more folks to use the mirror network).
It's the mirror network where it would be useful to have the header and footer. >> It's easy enough to modify one of the existing header/footer files for >> use with Subversion. > > That should be fine. > > -Hyrum > > > -- > > uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy > http://www.uberSVN.com/ >
