On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> wrote: > Hyrum K Wright wrote on Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:29:59 -0500: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Paul Querna --- who wrote the initial revprop packing patch (the f5 one, >> > which has been reverted) --- mentions that his use case for revprop >> > packing has vanished due to hardware upgrades (acquiring SSD l2arc >> > disks). >> >> Not everybody has an SSD. >> >> > With that in mind, what's the fate of the (flat files -based) >> > 'revprop-packing' branch? Will anyone need it by the time 1.8.0 is >> > released? If not, we may forget about the branch and avoid finishing >> > and reintegrating it for 1.8.0. >> >> I'd still like to get the branch reintegrated back to trunk. The code >> is written, is there a compelling reason (other than status quo bias) >> *not* to get it back to trunk? > > Works for me.
That would be the "status quo bias" I was talking about. :) Does something stop working for you if the branch is reintergrated? -Hyrum -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com/
