On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Does r1154023 help at all? It's fairly simple, but "feels" like the >>> right place to be destroying the wc_ctx of a client context when >>> disposing of the SVNClient object. The tests still pass, but I didn't >>> test this specific functionality. >>> >>> (Even if it doesn't improve the situation, I'd like to leave it in, >>> since it improves the memory situation a bit.) >>> >> >> Testing on Windows. Will let you know. > > OK, I came up with a reliable recipe on Windows using Subclipse that > produces the problem. After merging this change to the branch the problem > is fixed! > Assuming you nominate this for backport, please add my +1
Great! I'll get this nominated and backported in time for beta3. -Hyrum -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com/