On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:27:02PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: > Stefan Sperling wrote: > > It does not generate conflicts because of the way REV1 is chosen, > > and because of the way PATH1 and PATH2 are chosen. > > In fact, this must imply that you *can* get conflicts if any of the > changes on trunk after rX conflicts with the "feature". But the > recommended work flow would be to do the last "catch-up" (which defines > X) just before the re-integrate, so the opportunity for such conflicts > would be small.
Yes, precisely. Thanks for correcting this point.