On Jun 25, 2011 7:30 AM, "Ivan Zhakov" <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:25, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Just a heads up: the serf devs plan to bump serf from 0.7.x to 1.0.x > > on the next release (imminent). That release will contain the error > > string functionality discussed a month or so ago (for some work in > > ra_serf), and other API changes that shouldn't impact Subversion > > greatly. > > > > While I'm not comfortable with aspects of the serf API, and have > > hesitated calling it 1.0, making the next release 0.8.x and keeping > > that alive for Subversion's lifetime just doesn't make sense. Thus, we > > will bump it to a true 1.0.x release and maintain that for the > > lifetime of its primary consumer (svn 1.7.x). > > Just a stupid question: is it makes sense to make serf separate > library? Is there any users of serf library others than Subversion? > May be we can include serf library to Subversion as part of internals > of libsvn_ra_serf? We can always release as separate library when API > will stabilized and etc.
Serf is used by others already; not just Subversion. mod_pagespeed and Apache httpd to name two. There may be more that I/we haven't been made aware of... Cheers, -g
