On 06/24/2011 01:35 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 24.06.2011 17:50, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> Having read and considered the replies received thus far, I'm dubbing this a >> non-issue and moving on. Thanks for the feedback, all who provided it. > > Just for the record, this same issue has existed since "svn log" first > accepted the --verbose flag. I've not heard any screaming, so either > people don't parse "svn log" outputat all, or they don't use -v (or now > --diff), or they can handle the different output that these options produce. > > Either way, not our problem.
'svn log --verbose' existed before our 1.0 release, though, and has a reliable and trivially explainable affect on the parsing algorithm. Hardly an interesting comparison. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
