On 25.05.2011 06:34, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 03:00, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: >>> 2011/5/24 Branko Čibej <br...@e-reka.si>: >>>> On 24.05.2011 11:02, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >>>> [...] > I'm fully agree with Bert that moving truepath conversion to > libsvn_client as bad idea and would introduct gigantic slowdown for > some Windows clients.
Hmm ... I have a hard time imagining why this conversion would be so expensive, but I'll take your word for it. There is of course another option ... the exact opposite in fact: to take the truepath conversion _out_ of libsvn_client. :) But then you'd have to require every client to tweak the target array exactly right for each command. I don't like the is_move idea; it's too hacky, and too specific to one single use case. Perhaps the target array could be changed to contain both "given name" and "true name", but that would require rev'ing most of the libsvn_client API, which sounds even worse ... sigh. It's time to think about why exactly, and when, we need that truepath conversion, before layering yet another hack on top of it. -- Brane
