This is already nominated elsewhere in the file. (Hint: look in the 'Vetoed' section. :) )
-Hyrum On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:46 AM, <phi...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: philip > Date: Fri May 20 16:46:29 2011 > New Revision: 1125459 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1125459&view=rev > Log: > * STATUS: propose r1036429 > > Modified: > subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS > > Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=1125459&r1=1125458&r2=1125459&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original) > +++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Fri May 20 16:46:29 2011 > @@ -15,6 +15,13 @@ Status of 1.6.17: > Candidate changes: > ================== > > + * r1036429 > + Fix svnsync_tests 29 for issue 3641. > + Justification: > + Server assert using BDB. > + Votes: > + +1: philip > + > Veto-blocked changes: > ===================== > > > >
