On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Julian Foad <julian.f...@wandisco.com> wrote: > Oh, it looks like the choice of name > > '<SHA1>.pristine' > > was not discussed in that thread. Two or three of us thought that > seemed like a sensible choice of name. The other reasonable option is > to keep the old extension so that the new names would be > > '<SHA1>.svn-base' > > The advantage would be that if anyone has already set up their tools to > filter out '*.svn-base' they wouldn't have to change that configuration. > > Any opinions?
+1 for .svn-base. No need to change just to change it. -- justin
