On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 00:54, Lieven Govaerts <svn...@mobsol.be> wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:53 PM, <cmpil...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Author: cmpilato >> Date: Wed May 18 15:53:04 2011 >> New Revision: 1124306 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1124306&view=rev >> Log: >> * notes/berlin-11-agenda >> Add my first-pass notes about the discussions we've had here in >> Berlin. Others may wish to fill in more of the details as they >> recall them. >> >> Modified: >> subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda >> >> Modified: subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda?rev=1124306&r1=1124305&r2=1124306&view=diff >> >> ============================================================================== >> --- subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda (original) >> +++ subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda Wed May 18 15:53:04 >> 2011 >> @@ -5,12 +5,17 @@ discuss, and make themselves merry. >> >> [ should we include an expected attendee list? ] >> >> -Potential items for discussion: >> +POTENTIAL ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION >> +============================== >> + >> * Let's finish Subversion 1.7 >> + * Externals discussion >> * ra_serf issues >> - Should we leave serf as default http library? >> - Checkout/update editor memory and performance issues. May be >> it is worth implementing non-skelta update editor mode in ra_serf. >> + - Serf request ordering problem when re-submitting for authn. >> > > What is the "serf request ordering problem"? Never heard of any problems > with that code. > Lieven > I've filled issue 72 in serf issue tracker: http://code.google.com/p/serf/issues/detail?id=72
I'm not sure should I add an issue for that to Subversion issue tracker too. -- Ivan Zhakov
