> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: woensdag 18 mei 2011 11:16
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; Hyrum K Wright
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1104610 - in
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: props.c wc_db.c wc_db.h
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:11, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: woensdag 18 mei 2011 11:07
> >> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> >> Cc: Hyrum K Wright
> >> Subject: RE: svn commit: r1104610 - in
> >> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: props.c wc_db.c wc_db.h
> >>
> >> No, we said if somebody breaks the build, then it can be reverted.
> >>
> >> Breaking the tests does not qualify. You were out of line. I just got
> >> telling off people in Lucene-land for this. I also said that if it were
up
> >> to me, I would warn somebody about the anti social behavior once, and
> >> remove
> >> their commit privs on the second time. It is THAT much of a problem in
the
> >> community dynamics.
> >>
> >> Don't do that again.
> >
> > Does breaking all the property handling code qualify?
>
> No.
>
> If you felt the changes were interfering with your work, then you can
> always apply a reversion to your local working copy to continue your
> work. Then, when Hyrum got back online, he could figure out what he
> did and how to move it forward.
>
> For most people, his changes may have had no impact at all.
Well, yesterday afternoon I had 4 individuals asking me in person why their
test were broken, and this was why.
(There was no problem in neon after all).
If I would have committed a change with similar breakage you would have
shouted at me.
And because Hyrum is our release manager, or maybe because he pays you some
checks, you threat him differently?
Bert
