On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 23:15, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > On 05/16/2011 07:52 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: >> One thing I am a little confused about, but maybe it is a question for >> C-Mike. When Serf is used, the number of HTTP requests does not go >> down very much. 81,938 -> 80,928 I imagine this is because Serf >> already did not do all of the PROPFIND nonsense we do with Neon? >> Still, what are the HTTPv2 benefits that Serf is supposed to see? I >> seem to only see benefits when using Neon. > > I'd need to compare befores and afters to answer this with confidence, and > I'm just not up for it tonight. > > Here's what I know: > > In 1.6, Serf had a property cache in place that was *supposed* to help > reduce unnecessary requests. That cache is no longer present, because Ivan > said it wasn't actually providing much benefit in real-world cases. > Correction: I've reimplemented that cache and made it even better than it was in 1.6. See blncache.c for details.
-- Ivan Zhakov
