On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 13:45, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: >> i...@apache.org wrote on Sun, May 15, 2011 at 14:24:46 -0000: >>> Author: ivan >>> Date: Sun May 15 14:24:45 2011 >>> New Revision: 1103391 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1103391&view=rev >>> Log: >>> * notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda >>> (): Add notes to discuss. >>> >>> Modified: >>> subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda >>> >>> Modified: subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda >>> URL: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda?rev=1103391&r1=1103390&r2=1103391&view=diff >>> ============================================================================== >>> --- subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda (original) >>> +++ subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda Sun May 15 14:24:45 >>> 2011 >>> @@ -9,4 +9,8 @@ Potential items for discussion: >>> * Let's finish Subversion 1.7 >>> * What's the plan for 1.8? >>> * Key signing >>> + * ra_serf issues >>> + - Should we leave serf as default http library? >> >> Some issues here... >> >> serf is Apache licensed, neon is LGPL licensed, ASF projects must not >> require non-AL-compatible defaults for non-optional features. > Could you please provide a link for such requirements? Also we can > consider http protocol isn't 'non-optional feature'
We can. HTTP access has *always* been an optional bit of the Subversion client, and using neon, either as the default or not, should not pose a problem with ASF guidelines (so long as we don't distribute neon, which we no longer do). -Hyrum
