Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:05:50 +0000:
> It turns out that on trunk, we are using apr_int64_t which Daniel
> tells me is still incorrect,

For the record, Roderich pointed it out too:

> >> Patch below. The problem is still present in branches/1.6.x, while trunk 
> >> has
> >> rewritten packed_offset_cache() and shard is now an apr_int64_t (which
> >> will work,
> >> though still not literally consistent with the creation of the cache).

Reply via email to