Mark Eichin wrote on Thu, May 12, 2011 at 16:26:56 -0400: > I haven't looked at the actual code (at this point I may be out of > time and have to go with convincing people that git-svn's > approximation is good enough)
Just a reminder, you always have the option to use svnsync + 'svnadmin dump' instead of 'svnrdump dump'. > but since I'd actually managed to narrow > it down to a clean test case that didn't involve any of the > dump-mangling I'm doing for the actual task, I figured it best to get > that out there so people closer to the code can give it a try. Thanks for the report; looking forward to see the concrete details (that script which our mailing list software killed).
