On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 15:04, <hwri...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: hwright > Date: Tue May 3 19:04:24 2011 > New Revision: 1099193 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099193&view=rev > Log: > For info, don't fake a completely bogus revision for added nodes, just > report an invalid revision. > > In updating the tests, I noticed we report "Resource is not under version > control" in the XML for nodes with invalid revnums. While this isn't > strictly true for added nodes, I'll leave that fix for future change.
Eh? Shouldn't those tests be marked with XFail, rather than BAD OUTPUT? -g
