> -----Original Message----- > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] > Sent: zondag 24 april 2011 12:24 > To: 'Stefan Küng'; 'Subversion Development' > Subject: RE: externals not respected until committed > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] > > Sent: zondag 24 april 2011 11:08 > > To: Subversion Development > > Subject: Re: externals not respected until committed > > > > On 24.04.2011 11:01, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 10:48:44AM +0200, Stefan Küng wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> This happened sometime last week I guess, since I'm updating TSVN to > > >> use the latest SVN trunk usually on weekends: > > >> > > >> When I set an svn:external property, it isn't respected on an update > > >> until I commit the property. Before, I could set or modify an > > >> external property, then run update to get the changes, do my testing > > >> and *then* commit the property change. Now I have to first commit > > >> the property change. That's not good - I'd like to test such a > > >> change first before I commit it. > > > > > > It's going to come back, but possibly as an optional feature. > > > See http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-04/0324.shtml > > > > That post talks about such properties on added directories. > > But it doesn't work for existing directories either: > > I have my 'ext' folder for years now in the TSVN repository and the > > svn:externals property is on that folder for the same amount of time. > > It's not freshly added. > > > > I only modify that property, which existed before and now only points to > > a different revision and/or a different tag. > > That post should have talked about 'local changes' instead of just added > directories which are just one kind of local change. > > Over the last few minor Subversion releases (1.2-1.6) we started to > sometimes respect local changes to the svn:externals property instead of > only their committed version. > (The thread goes into more details and I expect we will look at this topic > at SvnDay in more detail) > > But the result is: You can either have a guaranteed stable externals > behavior where externals are always modified/followed (and file externals > can be properly removed) or you can allow local changes to svn:externals to > be processed. > > But you simply can't have both, unless we design a new way to process > externals (with its own storage model), which is currently not in the 1.7 > roadmap. > > > For 1.7 there will probably be a flag which will allow you to shoot yourself > in the foot by processing local-only versions of svn:externals properties. > Which resolves the common "How can I test svn:externals?" and "Can I have > my > own externals to override the repository ones?" (mini-viewspec) scenarios. > (Suggestions for the '--argument-name' are welcome. --force is already > taken)
Since r1096306 available at the libsvn_client level. Bert