On 06.04.2011 16:17, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > I'd love to see a better suggestion, ideally one that avoids the glut of new > queries and bifurcation of the "depth" concept into 3 or 4 different handler > functions such as what I recall was the case for what should have been a > relatively simple 'proplist' operation.
The alternative is to recursively walk the database in code, keeping a long-term lock and throwing performance to the dogs. -- Brane
