On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> Very cool to see something which will hopefully give us some > quantitative measure of performance. > > I've seen people submit reports based on particular revisions. Would > it be possible to run the same suite of tools across a number of > different revisions to give us some sense of change over time? It'd > be nice to know if we're getting better or worse, or how particular > changes impacted performance, etc. > > Just a thought. Not sure if you have looked at the wiki but I have been posting that info with the stats for that reason. I figured many of the same people would just post new results for 1.7 over time and we would start seeing a pattern of improvement. I did not go back to some of the older 1.7 revisions to show some of the recent performance work, but that is something I have considered. I am currently running the tests to an HTTP server and changing the server between 1.6 and 1.7. I will post the results when all the combinations(serf/neon1.6/1.7) are done. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
