On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:36, <rhuij...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: rhuijben > Date: Mon Mar 21 14:36:21 2011 > New Revision: 1083805 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1083805&view=rev > Log: > Following up on storing tree conflicts on the node itself, stop looking > for conflicts on nodes that don't exist when calling svn_wc__db_read_info().
Hmm? Couldn't you have a delete/delete conflict? The node wouldn't exist, but a conflict would. How does this case not apply here? And assuming that is the case, then should additional comments be added to update_editor.c to explain the situation? (to avoid future questions like mine) >... Cheers, -g
