Alan Wood wrote: > Sorry for the confusion with the version labels. No problem. I was just concerned that maybe we weren't successfully getting the message out that these are builds of software that is still under development, but it sounds like you were aware so that's OK. It did make me double-check what "svn --version" reports, and I see it says "1.7.0 (dev build)", and I thought maybe it would be better if it said "1.7.0-dev (... something ...)" instead, so I wrote a separate email about that.
- Julian
