On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:34, Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote: >... > So with the temporary table approach the callback really has to use a > separate database connection to read/write the database from within the > callback. > > However I think that is also the case if we were to avoid the table and > simply lock the main database; if just one connection was reused it > might be attempt to reuse an SQLite statement.
And note that we work really hard to use a single SDB connection. We re-use that as much as we can. I don't even know how we'd start to bring in more connections. Maybe under the covers, wc_db could open specialized connections. But, really? Why can't we simply put restrictions on those callbacks? I'm unclear on this part. Cheers, -g
