s...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 22:51:52 -0000:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Tue Mar  8 22:51:51 2011
> New Revision: 1079592
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1079592&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/svn/main.c
>   (svn_cl__cmd_table): Document foreign repos merges in merge help text.
> 
> Modified:
>     subversion/trunk/subversion/svn/main.c
> 
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/svn/main.c
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/svn/main.c?rev=1079592&r1=1079591&r2=1079592&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/svn/main.c (original)
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/svn/main.c Tue Mar  8 22:51:51 2011
> @@ -893,6 +893,14 @@ const svn_opt_subcommand_desc2_t svn_cl_
>       "\n"
>       "         svn diff ^/trunk@500 ^/feature@HEAD\n"
>       "\n"
> +     "     Note that a 2-URL merge can also merge from foreign 
> repositories.\n"
> +     "     While SOURCE1 and SOURCE2 must both come from the same 
> repository,\n"
> +     "     TARGET_WCPATH may come from a different repository than the 
> sources.\n"
> +     "     However, there are some caveats. Most notably, copies made in 
> the\n"
> +     "     merge source will be transformed into plain additions in the 
> merge\n"
> +     "     target, since the copyfrom information is only valid within the\n"
> +     "     source repository.\n"

s/within the source repository/within a single repository/
(or other phrasing that captures the "Doesn't cross repository boundaries" 
semantics)

Also: is "copyfrom information" a user-facing phrase?

> +     "\n"
>       "\n"
>       "  The following applies to all types of merges:\n"
>       "\n"
> 
> 

Reply via email to