On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 17:54, Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> Dongsheng Song <dongsh...@apache.org> writes:
>
>> Index: l10n-report.py
>> ===================================================================
>> --- l10n-report.py (revision 1080141)
>> +++ l10n-report.py (working copy)
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>> FROM_ADDRESS = "Subversion Translation Status
>> <nore...@subversion.apache.org>"
>> LIST_ADDRESS = "dev@subversion.apache.org"
>> SUBJECT_TEMPLATE = "[l10n] Translation status report for %s r%s"
>> +MAIL_THREAD_ID = '<translation_status_report_for...@subversion.apache.org>'
>>
>> def _rev():
>> dollar = "$Revision$"
>> @@ -204,6 +205,8 @@
>> msg["X-Mailer"] = "l10n-report.py r%s" % _rev()
>> msg["Reply-To"] = LIST_ADDRESS
>> msg["Mail-Followup-To"] = LIST_ADDRESS
>> + msg["In-Reply-To"] = MAIL_THREAD_ID % (branch_name.replace('/',
>> '_'))
>> + msg["References"] = msg["In-Reply-To"]
>> #
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/auto-submitted-keywords/auto-submitted-keywords.xhtml
>> msg["Auto-Submitted"] = 'auto-generated'
>> msg.set_type("text/plain")
>
> In-Reply-To and References would usually contain message-ids, what you
> are inserting is a fake message-id -- no email has it. A MUA won't find
> the referenced message-id, it doesn't exist, but will see multiple
> messages that refer to that id. I guess lots of MUAs will react by
> grouping those messages together. Is that what you want to achieve?
>
> --
> Philip
>
Do you mean the following behavior ?
http://people.apache.org/~dongsheng/image/public/mail_report_threaded.png
This is exactly what I needed.
--
Dongsheng
