On 09/03/2011 20:17, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 22:07, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:34, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: >>> ... >>> It seems I found reason why ra_serf is slower than ra_neon. ra_serf >>> sends CHECKOUT request for _each_ folder and file that being imported, >>> while ra_neon perform it only for root directory. Maybe DAV experts >>> can answer which behavior is correct: should WebDAV client CHECKOUT >>> each resource being modified or it's fine to CHECKOUT only the root of >>> commit operation? >> >> There is no other WebDAV server to talk to, besides our own. That is >> one of the primary rationales behind the HTTPv2 effort: recognizing >> reality, rather than living in an theoretical world. >> >> Thus, if Neon's approach works with our server, then ra_serf can go >> ahead and use that approach, too. >> > Hi Greg, > > My investigations was wrong: actually ra_neon doesn't send CHECKOUT > request only for sub-directories and file of directories being added > in the same commit. We still have to CHECKOUT directories when using > HTTPv1 to provide baseline. > > Anyway I've implemented ra_neon's approach in r1079967. > > John, > > Could you please provide timings of 'svn import' with updated > Subversion trunk and Serf trunk?
Apparently fixed! To a remote 1.6.15 server: ra_serf: 18 seconds ra_neon: 16 seconds To a localhost trunk server: ra_serf: 18 seconds ra_neon: 18 seconds Great work! John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake
