Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> writes: > And to be clear: the server *could* just remain silent, and the proxy > would insert the SVN-VTxn-Name header in the response back to the > client, right? Would that be an improvement/simplification?
I don't think so. Normal operation: - client sends POST - server creates transaction called TXN-NAME - server replies SVN-Txn-Name:TXN-NAME - client send !svn/txn/TXN-NAME - server extracts TXN-NAME VTXN operation: - client sends POST - proxy adds SVN-VTxn-Name:UUID - server creates transaction called TXN-NAME - server replies SVN-VTxn-Name:UUID - proxy passes - client sends !svn/vtxn/UUID - proxy passes - server extracts UUID and maps to TXN-NAME -- Philip
