On 04/03/11 13:48, Philip Martin wrote:
> John Beranek <j...@redux.org.uk> writes:
> 
>>> One thing you could try is identifying which revision causes the
>>> problem.  I'm guessing  that r1072301 will PASS, it would be good to
>>> know which is the first revision to FAIL.
>>
>> Hmm, no - r1072301 FAILs too.
> 
> But it can't be crashing in svn_temp_deserializer__resolve because that
> function doesn't exist in r1072301.  That implies it is not the
> serialisation code that is causing the problem.

Argh, apologies - I've got myself confused between different WCs due to
use of 'pushd'. Indeed r1072301 is a PASS!

Sorry,

John.

-- 
John Beranek                         To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/                                 -- William Blake

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to