On 17.02.2011 13:39, Julian Foad wrote: > Let me point out the background, in case you weren't aware. There has > been a general feeling (especially during the WC re-write) that the WC > API wasn't well suited to being maintained as a public API and that we > should move in the direction of providing a better client-layer public > API instead.
I think going that way would be a terrible mistake. By all means make the WC API useful on its own. -- Brane
