Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> writes: > Philip, > > You vetoed the r962377 group since descend_into_replace() is XFail. > > I've un-xfailed that test in these commits: > 3485 * 11Jan26,02:35 danielsh@apache.o (2.5K) svn commit: r1063572 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/ > 3486 * 11Jan26,02:39 danielsh@apache.o (2.2K) svn commit: r1063573 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/replay.c > 3489 * 11Jan26,03:32 danielsh@apache.o (1.0K) svn commit: r1063592 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svnsync_tests.py > > Does your veto stand?
My veto for r962377+r962378 was based on the test showing that the implementation was not correct. Are you proposing to merge those 3 revisions as well and make the test PASS? -- Philip
