Daniel Becroft <djcbecr...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Hyrum K Wright <
> hy...@hyrumwright.org> wrote:
>
>     On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Noorul Islam K M <
>     noo...@collab.net> wrote:
>     >
>     > See below in line more information about the patches.
>     >
>     > Noorul Islam K M <noo...@collab.net> writes:
>     ...
>     >> 3. Issue 3690
>     >>
>     >>    http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-01/0414.shtml
>     >>
>     >>    This is actually an enhancement and there were two
>     approaches. One
>     >>    that I initially submitted and another one suggested by
>     Hyrum. This
>     >>    thread has three to four patches which are pending review.
>     May be it
>     >>    is not getting reviewed because it is not yet finalized how
>     are are
>     >>    we going to proceed.
>     >>
>     >
>     > Above thread contains patches for issue 3690 which adds an
>     option
>     > "--ignore-properties" to log command so that user can ignore
>     revisions
>     > which has only property changes.
>    
>     I've said multiple times (both in regards to this, as well as the
>     ignore-mergeinfo-log branch) that I'd appreciate some discussion
>     surrounding the applicability of these features before committing
>     them.  Part of me sees the use, as they solve a real usability
>     problem
>     in my own life, but another part of me wonders if these are
>     specific
>     fixes for which other (non-core) solutions would be appropriate.
>    
>     Maybe I should spearhead that discussion, since I'm the guy who
>     wants
>     it so badly, but unfortunately my supply of tuits has been quite
>     low
>     lately.  I'm just not in any rush to get this work on trunk, as
>     if we
>     do add this functionality, I'd like to do it for as many
>     subcommands
>     as is reasonable, all in the same release.  And that ain't
>     happening
>     before 1.7 (imho).
>    
>     -Hyrum
>
>
> My 0.02c - there was a question raised on the users@ list, regarding
> the ability to see the changes that *only* relate to properties. The
> use case was seeing the log for svn:externals changes on a directory.
>
> I guess this is the opposite of the above request: one where we can
> exclude all property changes, the other where we want nothing but
> property changes.
>

That means we need to have two options, --ignore-properties and
--properties-only. Can I work on these two on a private branch?

Thanks and Regards
Noorul

Reply via email to