"Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl> writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org]
>> Sent: woensdag 9 februari 2011 18:07
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r1068977 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
>> svn/cat-cmd.c tests/cmdline/cat_tests.py
>> 
>> Author: cmpilato
>> Date: Wed Feb  9 17:07:19 2011
>> New Revision: 1068977
>> 
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1068977&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix issue #3713 ("svn cat for non-existing file returns incorrect
>> exit-status").  Make 'svn cat' return a non-zero errorcode when one or
>> more targets fails.  Also print an error message in those situations.
>> 
>> * subversion/svn/cat-cmd.c
>>   (svn_cl__cat): Pass SVN_ERR_FS_NOT_FOUND to svn_cl__try in order to
>>     catch this error when processing non existent URL targets, print
>>     warning and proceed with other targets. Print error message at the
>>     end if operation fails on any one of the targets and return 1.
>> 
>> * subversion/tests/cmdline/cat_tests.py
>>   (cat_local_directory, cat_nonexistent_file, cat_skip_uncattable,
>>    cat_unversioned_file, cat_url_special_characters):
>>     Update return code and use regular expressions to match output.
>>   (cat_non_existing_remote_file): New test.
>>   (test_list): Add reference to new test.
>> 
>> Patch by: Noorul Islam K M <noo...@collab.net>
>>           (Tweaked by me.)
>
> FAIL:  cat_tests.py 1: cat a local directory
> FAIL:  cat_tests.py 4: cat a nonexistent file
> FAIL:  cat_tests.py 5: cat should skip uncattable resources
> FAIL:  cat_tests.py 6: cat an unversioned file parent dir thinks exists
>
> These tests fail on all ra-layers and there are a few more errors on the 
> layers that have authorization support.
>
>
> Noorul, can you run at least the ra_local tests before sending a patch?
>

I ran 'make check' and it did not complain. Doesn't that cover ra_local?

Thanks and Regards
Noorul

> (It would be nicer if you could test all relevant ra layers, but that is a 
> bit too much to ask)
>
>       Bert

Reply via email to