Daniel Shahaf wrote: > I'd rather not remove their entries entirely from COMMITTERS.
+1. Being unable to contact them (currently) is a completely different thing from deciding to remove them from the list of committers. And failure to keep one's email address up to date is not a serious breach of committership responsibilities, for an inactive or infrequent committer, I'd say. > Just remove the (now-bogus) email addresses perhaps? Only if you're sure the email addresses are permanently defunct and not merely temporarily rejecting our attempts to contact them. - Julian > </$0.02> > > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 17:08:34 -0500: > > Well... we could try to find new/updated email addresses. Because of > > the committers' open source work, I bet they can be tracked down... > > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 15:12, Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org> wrote: > > > Question: if emails are bouncing, that almost certainly means these > > > folks have not filed CLAs, and in which case, they don't have commit > > > access anymore. Should we just remove them from COMMITTERS? > > > > > > -Hyrum