On 12/28/2010 6:28 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On 29.12.2010 01:33, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Hi devs,
I would really like the core improvement of my
work on SVN performance to become part of
1.7: the in-process fulltext cache.
While the risk is low (we already offer something
similar based on memcached), the caching code
is so fundamental to most other pending changes,
that I want to hear at least a second opinion:
^/subversion/branches/integrate-cache-membuffer
Take this as an opportunity for a last nightly deed
*k*nightly (which stresses even more that _nightly_
is exactly what we probably don't want)
(Ny!) in 2010 or a new year's resolution.
I'll take a look at it when I have a chance, but my first question is,
does it work in a long running (months) persistent multithreaded process
that LRU caches svn_fs_t, svn_repos_t and other objects for long periods
of time? I have a custom svn server that exposes the svn_fs.h API
through an Ice layer (see www.zeroc.com).
Thanks,
Blair
