On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:00 PM, <hwri...@apache.org> wrote: >> Author: hwright >> Date: Tue Dec 28 22:00:37 2010 >> New Revision: 1053461 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1053461&view=rev >> Log: >> First hack at a DOAP file for Subversion, as requested by the Powers That Be >> at the ASF. (But I think it's a Good Thing, too. ;) >> >> This was autogenerated by http://projects.apache.org/create.html >> >> * publish/doap.rdf: >> New. >> >> Added: >> subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf (with props) >> >> Added: subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf?rev=1053461&view=auto >> ============================================================================== >> --- subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf (added) >> +++ subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf Tue Dec 28 22:00:37 2010 >> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ >> +<?xml version="1.0"?> >> +<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl"?> >> +<rdf:RDF xml:lang="en" >> + xmlns="http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#"; >> + xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"; >> + xmlns:asfext="http://projects.apache.org/ns/asfext#"; >> + xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/";> >> +<!-- >> + Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more >> + contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with >> + this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. >> + The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 >> + (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with >> + the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at >> + >> + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >> + >> + Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software >> + distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, >> + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. >> + See the License for the specific language governing permissions and >> + limitations under the License. >> +--> >> + <Project rdf:about="http://subversion.apache.org/";> >> + <created>2010-12-28</created> >> + <license rdf:resource="http://usefulinc.com/doap/licenses/asl20"; /> >> + <name>Apache Subversion</name> >> + <homepage rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/"; /> >> + <asfext:pmc rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org"; /> >> + <shortdesc>Enterprise-class centralized version control for the >> masses</shortdesc> >> + <description>Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted >> as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its >> reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model >> and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users >> and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise >> operations.</description> >> + <bug-database rdf:resource="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/"; /> > > Couldn't we just use this URL for bug-database? > http://subversion.apache.org/issue-tracker.html
Sure could. :) (I'll probably get around to that at some point, but if anybody else wants to beat me to it, feel free.) > > >> + <mailing-list >> rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html"; /> >> + <download-page >> rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/source-code.html"; /> >> + <programming-language>C</programming-language> >> + <category >> rdf:resource="http://projects.apache.org/category/build-management"; /> > > They do not have version control or SCM as a category to use? I do > not think of Build Management as category for Subversion. >From http://projects.apache.org/categories.html: build-management Projects related to building/maintaining source code/websites. That seems to fit the Subversion bill pretty well. But if we'd like, we can include additional categories as well. -Hyrum
