I (Julian Foad) wrote: [...] > Studying the FSFS source code for the issues raised in this thread has > given me confidence that it seems to be doing the right thing, in > practice, at the moment. > > In 1043360 I added some comments about how to remove one source of > fragility in using the cached value. Again I'll say this looks > perfectly correct in its current usage. > > I'll go ahead and apply the remove-retry-logic-from-path-rev-absolute > patch now.
Committed revision 1043408. - Julian
