On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Becroft <djcbecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Philip Martin > <philip.mar...@wandisco.com>wrote: ... >> > I can't see any reason why all these files would need to be accessed. I >> seem >> > to recall some discussion about preventing/warning merging into modified >> > working copies, could this be the cause? >> >> The new check is for a single revision working copy, not an unmodified >> one. >> > > Ah, that makes more sense, I guess. Checking for an unmodified WC would mean > that the ability to run consecutive 'svn merge -c' commands would be > removed.
You can run 'svn merge -c17,85,90,123' if you need to merge multiple revs in the same operation. -Hyrum
