Ping. This patch submission has received no further comments.

Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
E: gav...@thespidernet.com


On 12/11/2010, at 3:43 AM, Julian Foad wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-11-10, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>> [[[
>> 
>> Canonicalize dirent/URL before passing to client API
>> 
>> * subversion/svn/merge-cmd.c (svn_cl__merge),
>>  subversion/svn/propget-cmd.c (svn_cl__propget),
>>  subversion/svn/proplist-cmd.c (svn_cl__proplist),
>>  subversion/svn/copy-cmd.c (svn_cl__copy),
>>  subversion/svn/mergeinfo-cmd.c (svn_cl__mergeinfo),
>>  subversion/svn/blame-cmd.c (svn_cl__blame),
>>  subversion/svn/log-cmd.c (svn_cl__log),
>>  subversion/svn/export-cmd.c (svn_cl__export),
>>  subversion/svn/info-cmd.c (svn_cl__info):
>>    Use svn_cl__opt_parse_path() instead of svn_opt_parse_path()
>>    followed by canonicalizing.
> 
> I thought that part looked good... but then discovered something.  See
> below.
> 
>> * subversion/svn/propdel-cmd.c (svn_cl__propdel),
>>  subversion/svn/propget-cmd.c (svn_cl__propget),
>>  subversion/svn/propset-cmd.c (svn_cl__propset),
>>  subversion/svn/proplist-cmd.c (svn_cl__proplist): 
>>    Canonicalize URL
> 
> Let's do that part inside the function svn_cl__revprop_prepare()
> instead, like I mentioned in another email, and not include it in this
> patch.  (You missed the call in propedit-cmd, and it won't be possible
> to miss any calls if we do it that way.)
> 
>> * subversion/tests/cmdline/mergeinfo_tests.py
>>  (mergeinfo_url_special_characters),
>>  subversion/tests/cmdline/prop_tests.py
>>  (props_url_special_characters),
>>  subversion/tests/cmdline/merge_tests.py
>>  (merge_url_special_characters),
>>  subversion/tests/cmdline/log_tests.py
>>  (log_url_special_characters),
>>  subversion/tests/cmdline/copy_tests.py
>>  (copy_url_special_characters),
>>  subversion/tests/cmdline/blame_tests.py
>>  (blame_url_special_characters): 
>>    New tests
> 
> The purpose of the tests is to check that the commands properly accept
> and canonicalize non-canonical target paths.  That's not clear from just
> reading them, so let's add a comment in each one just to say that, so
> that future maintainers will know.  It might be a good idea to rename
> the test functions and description away from "special characters" to
> something like "non-canonical targets", since a path or URL can be
> non-canonical even if it doesn't contain "special" characters.
> 
> Some of these subcommands accept either a local path or URL, but the
> tests only check URLs - was that intentional?
> 
> 
>> +def mergeinfo_url_special_characters(sbox):
>> +  """special characters in svn mergeinfo URL"""
>> +
>> +  sbox.build()
>> +  wc_dir = sbox.wc_dir
>> +  special_url = sbox.repo_url + '/%2E'
> 
> Why construct a URL that is non-canonical in two ways at the same time?
> The fact that a character that doesn't need to be percent-encoded ('.'
> in this case) is percent-encoded makes it non-canonical, but ending a
> URL with '/.' also makes it non-canonical.  You should be able to test
> for each of those separately.
> 
> Aha.  I think I have discovered the problem.  The arguments have already
> been through svn_uri_canonicalize() once, inside
> svn_cl__args_to_target_array_print_reserved().  The trouble is that it
> didn't work properly it converted
> 
>  ".../%2E" to ".../."
> 
> but it should have converted
> 
>  ".../%2E" to "..."
> 
> I think.  Can a URI expert confirm this?
> 
> So I think running the output through svn_uri_canonicalize again is not
> the right solution, and we need to fix svn_uri_canonicalize instead.
> 
> If that analysis is right, then we will indeed need to test a URL like
> repo_url + '/%2e', but only a single test.
> 
> - Julian
> 
> 

Reply via email to