"Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> writes: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Paul Burba <ptbu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So unless somebody has a fix coming soon for issue #3641, I think we >> should either backport r1036429 or veto it *and* revert r962378. The >> third option, leaving r962378 but not backporting r1036429 seems the >> worst of all worlds, since we are introducing an assert. > > The current 1.6.15 already has a number of important fixes that I'm > eager to get into our users' hands. If there isn't an iminent fix for > this issue, let's back out r962378 from the branch, and reroll > (hopefully today?)
I agree. -- Philip
