On 11/18/2010 09:57 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:09:57 -0500:
[...]
>> Another subtlety. Say some other change is committed in our under '/Z' in
>> r3 (but not to '/Z/B/E/alpha'):
>>
>> svn_fs_copied_from('/Z', r3) = NULL, SVN_INVALID_REVNUM
>> svn_fs_copied_from('/Z/B/E/alpha', r3) = NULL, SVN_INVALID_REVNUM
>>
>> svn_fs_history_prev('/Z', r3) = '/Z', r2
>> svn_fs_history_prev('/Z/B/E/alpha', r3) = '/Z/B/E/alpha', r2
>>
>
> Wouldn't the results of the above four calls be the same regardless
> of whether or not r3 touched /Z/B/E/alpha?
Um... yes. :-)
>> Notice also that svn_fs_history_prev() doesn't return information about the
>> copy source either, because the previous "interesting history location" is
>> the copy itself.
>>
>
> Okay; in other words, svn_fs_history_prev() considers a path-revision
> which are the *result* of a copy operation an "interesting" location.
Exactly.
> From this I understand that, if r20 did not touch '^/trunk', then
> the two calls:
> svn_fs_history_prev('^/branches/branch', r21)
> svn_fs_history_prev('^/trunk', r20)
> will behave identically.
Yes.
> On the other hand, in your example, I expect that svn_fs_copied_from()
> will return /tr...@20?
Yes. svn_fs_copied_from('^/branches/branch', r21) = '/trunk', r20
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
