Since Daniel is a committer, I suspect he will track this change (relieving you of the burden of doing so).
-Hyrum On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Gavin Beau Baumanis <gav...@thespidernet.com> wrote: > Ping. This has received no further comments. > > > > Gavin "Beau" Baumanis > E: gav...@thespidernet.com > > > On 31/10/2010, at 12:42 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> Is there a reason not to apply this "let's not reinvent the wheel" patch? >> >> [[[ >> Index: subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c >> =================================================================== >> --- subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c (revision 1029231) >> +++ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c (working copy) >> @@ -2205,15 +2205,14 @@ read_rep_offsets(representation_t **rep_p, >> return SVN_NO_ERROR; >> } >> >> -/* Combine the revision and offset of the ID to a string that will >> - * be used as a cache key. Allocations will be made from POOL. >> +/* Return a string that uniquely identifies the noderev with the >> + * given ID, for use as a cache key. >> */ >> static const char * >> get_noderev_cache_key(const svn_fs_id_t *id, apr_pool_t *pool) >> { >> - return svn_fs_fs__combine_two_numbers(svn_fs_fs__id_rev(id), >> - svn_fs_fs__id_offset(id), >> - pool); >> + const svn_string_t *id_unparsed = svn_fs_fs__id_unparse(id, pool); >> + return id_unparsed->data; >> } >> >> /* Look up the NODEREV_P for ID in FS' node revsion cache. If noderev >> ]]] >> >> (It does not resolve my test failures.) >> >> Daniel >