On 10/08/2010 07:41 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Bert Huijben<b...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: style...@apache.org [mailto:style...@apache.org]
Sent: vrijdag 8 oktober 2010 13:52
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1005788 - /subversion/branches/gpg-agent-
password-store/subversion/libsvn_subr/config_file.c
Author: stylesen
Date: Fri Oct 8 11:52:01 2010
New Revision: 1005788
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1005788&view=rev
Log:
On the 'gpg-agent-password-store' branch:
* subversion/libsvn_subr/config_file.c
(svn_config_ensure): Add gpg-agent to config file.
Moving a irc question: 'Should we support the gpg keystore on Windows and OS/X?'
On Windows we support the Windows CryptoAPI and on OS/X we support the
keychain, so we can already assume that we support encrypted passwords there.
My personal idea would be to not support it on Windows (because it implies to
much commandline specific behavior), but do support it on OS/X. But I would
like to see more input.
I dunno. If we get the same ability from Keychain (which is
guaranteed to be available on OS X, iirc), then adding gpg-agent
support seems a bit redundant. We then have to answer questions about
precedence, and possibly add more config, and it just seems messy.
Plus, we haven't really heard much demand for it, anyway.
Does Apple keychain work if you ssh into a Mac? If not, then I could
see a use case for gpg keychain support.
Blair
