On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu> wrote: > On 01.10.2010 15:45, Paul Burba wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] >>>> Sent: vrijdag 1 oktober 2010 1:51 >>>> To: Subversion Development >>>> Subject: trunk failing tests on Windows XP (32 bit): prop-tests.py 33, >>>> stat-tests.py 5, upgrade-tests.py 11 >>>> >>>> Hi devs, >>>> >>>> The following tests fail on my machine (Windows XP 32-bit, built with >>>> VCE 2008, ra_local): >>>> >>>> - prop-tests.py 33: test properties of obstructed subdirectories >>>> svn: Can't open directory >>>> 'C:\research\svn\client_build\svn_trunk\Release\subversion\tests\cmdlin >>>> e\svn-test-work\working_copies\prop_tests-33\A\C': >>>> The directory name is invalid. >>>> >>>> - stat-tests.py 5: status on versioned items whose type has changed >>>> svn: Can't open directory >>>> 'C:\research\svn\client_build\svn_trunk\Release\subversion\tests\cmdlin >>>> e\svn-test-work\working_copies\stat_tests-5\A': >>>> The directory name is invalid. >>>> >>>> - upgrade_tests.py 11: missing directories and obstructing files >>>> svn: Can't open directory >>>> 'C:\research\svn\client_build\svn_trunk\Release\subversion\tests\cmdlin >>>> e\svn-test-work\working_copies\upgrade_tests-11\A\D': >>>> The directory name is invalid. >>>> >>>> They all seem to try to open some path as a directory, but it isn't a >>>> directory (but an empty file or something). >>>> >>>> Am I the only one seeing this? Is this known/normal? >>> This seems to be related to the APR version you use. (Paul Burba reported >>> this same problem earlier this week). >> Hi Johan, >> >> Bert is correct, I saw these failure earlier this week while using APR >> 1.3.12. All the failures occur when a file unexpectedly obstructs a >> directory. The APR macro APR_STATUS_IS_ENOTDIR in 1.3.x does not >> handle the "ERROR_DIRECTORY 267 The directory name is invalid" that >> Windows raises in this case. This was fixed in APR in >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=821306 and is in >> APR 1.4.2. >> >> Paul > > Duh. I thought this change had been back-ported long ago. Now I remember > that I was waiting for any kind of comment before doing that ... blech. > > I think we'll have to backport to APR 0.9 and 1.3 ... though trying to > get a 0.9 release out these days is going to be an exercise in futility. :)
Actually...the APR folks are thinking of doing an 0.9 release RSN: http://marc.info/?l=apr-dev&m=128619003510341&w=2 -Hyrum
