[Peter Samuelson] > Is this, then, a worthwhile feature addition? I don't want to add > syntax that nobody else wants. In particular, this patch highlights > the existing inconsistency of ":" vs. "-" as range operators.
Hmmm, in tests/cmdline/log_tests.py XFail(log_chanage_range), I see Lieven thought -c might someday take ranges with ":" instead of "-". But since the output uses "-", I'd argue the cut-and-paste utility of sticking with that outweighs the consistency of ":". Unless perhaps we should support both, which would be trivial. Peter
