C. Michael Pilato wrote on Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:27:35 -0400: > On 09/24/2010 08:46 AM, Geoff Rowell wrote: > > Is it too late to backport it for the upcoming release? > > It's not about the timing, really. We don't introduce new features in patch > releases. Now, that said, svnmucc isn't really part of our core product, so > perhaps it doesn't fall into this restriction. I wonder what other devs > think about this?
I'm fine with backporting patches that, formally, add a new feature (e.g., a new --option flag), given that they are localized and not overly invasive. (I wouldn't support a backport that adds a new feature but rewrites half of the internals.)
