On 21.09.2010 14:12, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Julian Reschke wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 13:46:13 +0200:
Hi,
just two comments without having looked at the remainder of the discussion.
1) If you need to augment a standard HTTP response code with additional
information, the right thing to use is DAV:error (see
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc4918.html#rfc.section.16>).
What does that gain us? As Jon said elsethread, generic DAV clients
aren't going to be making requests with V:old-value set.
I was just offering an option that may be cleaner than overloading the
semantics of other fields.
Also, if this is *purely* for SVN, another obvious solution is just to
add an extension element to the DAV:response element (in teh SVN
namespace...).
> ...
Best regards, Julian
